Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/790
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSinha, Jai B. P.-
dc.contributor.authorGupta, Parvinder-
dc.date.accessioned2010-01-16T11:51:04Z-
dc.date.available2010-01-16T11:51:04Z-
dc.date.copyright2000-06-
dc.date.issued2010-01-16T11:51:04Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/790-
dc.description.abstractTwo hundred nine MBA (Masters in Business Administration) students of a management institute rated their leadership styles and influence tactics as a part of their classroom exercise. The findings indicated that they preferred to adopt nurturant-task (NT) and participative styles more frequently than transformational style. Authoritarian style of leadership was least likely to be adopted by them. The first three styles were positively correlated suggesting the possibility of leaders moving back and forth between the styles. Rational persuasion and empowerment were most likely to be used as influence tactics, followed by personal appeal and consultation, reward for performance, use of authority, and so on. Although leadership styles were meaningfully related to influence tactics, there were enough overlaps to suggest that leaders flexibly use styles and influence tactics.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWP;2000-06-05/1605-
dc.subjectLeadershipen
dc.titleLeadership styles and influence tacticsen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
Appears in Collections:Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
WP 2000_1605.pdf660.75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.