Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/8565
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBandyopadhyay, Tathagata-
dc.contributor.authorRaghuram, G.-
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-08T09:09:52Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-08T09:09:52Z-
dc.date.copyright2008-
dc.date.issued2010-09-08T09:09:52Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/8565-
dc.description.abstractA famous brand of sauce tested positive for Sudan I (a prohibited carcinogenic dye added for colour enhancement), which led to the biggest food products recall off the shelves in supermarkets and departmental stores of Britain. This brought to light that the mandatory testing of Sudan I by Spices Board of India (SBI) was unable to retain the brand equity and help confidence building in the EU. Apart from Sudan I, there was also need to test for Aflatoxins. Big exporters found the tests useless and small exporters remained the cause of worry for quality control. The case brings forth issues about better traceability of food chains, testing methods, statistical quality control, and alternative ways and means for packing. It also highlights issues that were overlooked by SBI, which escalated an anticipatable problem.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleChilli in Soup (B)en
dc.typeCases and Notesen
Appears in Collections:Cases and Notes

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.