Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/9780
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRam Mohan, T. T.
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-19T08:39:16Z
dc.date.available2010-10-19T08:39:16Z
dc.date.copyright2001
dc.date.issued2001-10-19T08:39:16Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/9780
dc.descriptionEconomic and Political Weekly, Vol. 36, Issue No. 52, 29 Dec, 2001en
dc.description.abstractPrivatisation is very much the flavour of the day. Many enthusiasts of privatisation seem to believe that a shift from public to private ownership will automatically make for improved performance. Yet there is little in economic theory or the empirical evidence on privatisation that lends support to such a simplistic belief. The evidence on the impact of privatisation is by no means unmixed. In particular, in less developed countries, where law enforcement and corporate governance tend to be weak, private ownership does not necessarily make for better performance. It is possible, based on the research on privatisation, to draw some tentative conclusions for privatisation policy in a context such as ours
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectPrivatizationen
dc.titlePrivatization: theory and evidenceen
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Privatisation_Theory_and_Evidence.pdf
  Restricted Access
363.94 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.