dc.contributor.author | Mukherjee, Saral | |
dc.contributor.author | Chatterjee, A. K. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-10-27T10:54:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-10-27T10:54:45Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 2006 | |
dc.date.issued | 2006-10-27T10:54:45Z | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11718/10032 | |
dc.description | European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 169, No. 3, (March 16, 2006), pp. 723-41 | en |
dc.description.abstract | The shifting bottleneck (SB) heuristic is among the most successful approximation methods for solving the job
shop problem. It is essentially a machine based decomposition procedure where a series of one machine sequencing
problems (OMSPs) are solved. However, such a procedure has been reported to be highly ineffective for the
flow shop problems. In particular, we show that for the 2-machine flow shop problem, the SB heuristic will deliver
the optimal solution in only a small number of instances. We examine the reason behind the failure of the
machine based decomposition method for the flow shop. An optimal machine based decomposition procedure
is formulated for the 2-machine flow shop, the time complexity of which is worse than that of the celebrated
Johnson s rule. The contribution of the present study lies in showing that the same machine based decomposition
procedures which are so successful in solving complex job shops can also be suitably modified to optimally solve
the simpler flow shops | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.subject | Scheduling | en |
dc.subject | Flow shop | en |
dc.subject | Shifting Bottleneck Heuristic | en |
dc.subject | Machine Based Decomposition | en |
dc.subject | Johnson’s Rule | en |
dc.title | Applying machine-based decomposition in 2 machine flow shops | en |
dc.type | Article | en |