dc.contributor.author | Dhiman, Amit | |
dc.contributor.author | Singh, Manjari | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-10-29T05:27:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-10-29T05:27:27Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 2007 | |
dc.date.issued | 2007-10-29T05:27:27Z | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11718/10080 | |
dc.description | Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, Vol. 32, No. 1, (January-March, 2007), pp. 75-87 | en |
dc.description.abstract | Politics is a bane of administrative systems such as performance appraisals. It not only
debilitates the system’s credibility in the eyes of various stakeholders, but also adversely affects
the employees’ morale and the organizational effectiveness. While admitting that rooting it out
completely is impossible, it is in the organizational interest that it is mitigated to a large extent.
In case of performance appraisals, assessees and assessors, both try to influence the assessees’
performance rating to advance self-interests. | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.subject | Appraisal Politics | en |
dc.subject | Assessors and Assesses | en |
dc.subject | Ambiguity | en |
dc.title | Appraisal politics: revisiting from assessor's perspective | en |
dc.type | Article | en |