Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSaxena, Richa
dc.contributor.authorBhatnagar, Deepti
dc.contributor.authorMishra, Smeeta
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-04T04:03:30Z
dc.date.available2011-05-04T04:03:30Z
dc.date.copyright2009-10-15
dc.date.issued2009-10-15T04:03:30Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/10471
dc.descriptionVikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, 34, 4 (October – December 2009), 114-17.en
dc.description.abstractMen are dominant, women are subservient;” “Men are aggressive, women are passive;” “Men are agentic, women are communal;” “Men are power-centric, women are person-centric;” “Men are single-focused, women are multi-focused;” “Men are bread winners, women are home makers.” The list of differences identified by researchers is seamless. Similarities have, rarely if ever, been recorded or found their space in research journals. Questions that readily come to the mind are: Does biological difference transcend all boundaries and get reflected in attitudes and behaviours clubbed under binary heads as “male” and “female?” Or is it that when the “difference” hypothesis yields null results, interest in the research topic wanes?
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleGender and workplace experienceen
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record