dc.contributor.author | Ram Mohan, T. T. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-05-04T04:41:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-05-04T04:41:34Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-01-16 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-01-16T04:41:34Z | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11718/10475 | |
dc.description | Economic and Political Weekly, 45, 3 (January 16-22, 2010), 8-10. | en |
dc.description.abstract | There have been a number of
commissions and committees
on the financial crisis over the
past year, which have largely
covered the same ground in their
analysis and recommendations
for reform of the financial sector.
The Warwick Commission on
International Financial Reform,
constituted by the University of
Warwick in the United Kingdom,
however, strikes out on a different
path. It raises a number of
issues in a way that many other
reports have not. And it also
differs sharply in some of the
recommendations it makes. This
article highlights four themes
that figure in the report: macroprudential
regulation, rightsizing
the financial sector, regulatory
capture and home country versus
host country regulation. | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.title | Post-crisis regulation: a contrarian perspectiveve | en |
dc.type | Article | en |