Good and governance and corruption in the health sector: lessons from the Karnataka experience
Date
2012-09-07Author
Huss, R.
Green, A.
Sudarshan, H.
Karpagam, S.S.
Ramani, K. V.
Tomson, G.
Gerein, N.
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Strengthening good governance and preventing corruption in health care are
universal challenges. The Karnataka Lokayukta (KLA), a public complaints
agency in Karnataka state (India), was created in 1986 but played a prominent
role controlling systemic corruption only after a change of leadership in 2001
with a new Lokayukta (ombudsman) and Vigilance Director for Health (VDH).
This case study of the KLA (2001–06) analysed the:
Scope and level of poor governance in the health sector;
KLA objectives and its strategy;
Factors which affected public health sector governance and the operation of the
KLA.
We used a participatory and opportunistic evaluation design, examined docu-
ments about KLA activities, conducted three site visits, two key informant and
44 semi-structured interviews and used a force field model to analyse the
governance findings.
The Lokayukta and his VDH were both proactive and economically independent
with an extended social network, technical expertise in both jurisdiction and
health care, and were widely perceived to be acting for the common good. They
mobilized media and the public about governance issues which were affected by
factors at the individual, organizational and societal levels. Their investigations
revealed systemic corruption within the public health sector at all levels as well
as in public/private collaborations and the political and justice systems. However,
wider contextual issues limited their effectiveness in intervening. The departure
of the Lokayukta, upon completing his term, was due to a lack of continued
political support for controlling corruption.
Governance in the health sector is affected by positive and negative forces. A key
positive factor was the combined social, cultural and symbolic capital of the two
leaders which empowered them to challenge corrupt behaviour and promote
good governance. Although change was possible, it was precarious and requires
continuous political support to be sustained
Collections
- Journal Articles [3724]