Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSingh, Ramadhar
dc.contributor.authorBhargava, Shivganesh
dc.contributor.authorNorman, Kent L.
dc.date.accessioned2010-03-14T09:10:04Z
dc.date.available2010-03-14T09:10:04Z
dc.date.copyright1986-05
dc.date.issued2010-03-14T09:10:04Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/1131
dc.description.abstractAll the models of information integration predict that the greater the reliability of an information, the greater its effectiveness. However, they disagree with the relationship between reliability of information of one type and effectiveness of information of another type. The multiplying model predicts that reliability of information of one type should enhance effectiveness of information of another type; the relative-weight averaging model predicts just the opposite; and the adding and constant-weight averaging models predict that effectiveness of information of one kind is independent of the reliability of information of another kind. Experiment 1 demonstrated that Life Performance=Motivation x Ability. Experiment 2 tested the hypothesis that information reliability causes averaging of external information with the corresponding initial opinion of the judges. Accordingly, the effect of motivation information should be independent of the reliability of ability information and vice versa even within the multi-plying model. Results supported the hypothesis. Implications of this finding for test of multiplying models were discussed.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWP;1986/611
dc.subjectInformation reliabilityen
dc.subjectPerformance predictionen
dc.titleInformation reliability and prediction of performance: role of initial opinion in multiplying modelen
dc.typeWorking Paperen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record