Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDholakia, Ravindra H.
dc.contributor.authorPandya, Manish
dc.contributor.authorPateriya, Payal M.
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-22T10:39:48Z
dc.date.available2015-04-22T10:39:48Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/13306
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we have attempted to estimate the urban – rural income differential (URID) for 15 major states based on readily available data on GSDP by sectors, population and employment by sectors and urban – rural residence. There are three components of the URID, viz., worker population ratios (WPR), employment structure and labor productivity by sectors in urban and rural areas. We are unable to estimate the labor productivity differentials at the state level, but the other two factors are considered and the floor estimate for the URID is obtained for the 15 states in the four base years. Moreover, it is also shown with the help of the estimates available at the All India level that out of the three factors, employment structure is the most dominant one to determine URID and that the component of productivity differential is not very high. Assuming the same extent of the component of productivity differential for each state as for the country, estimates of the URID in the major states for the three base years are derived. We have also attempted an estimate of the URID for the country and the states in the likely base year of 2011-12 with corresponding urban and rural per capita incomes.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIndian Institute of Management, Ahmedabaden_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWP;2379
dc.subjectGSDPen_US
dc.subjectIncome differenceen_US
dc.subjectRural Incomeen_US
dc.subjectUrban Incomeen_US
dc.titleUrban – rural income differential in major states: contribution of structural factorsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record