dc.contributor.author | Pradhan, Vivek | |
dc.contributor.author | Evans, John C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Banerjee, Tathagata | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-05-12T11:08:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-05-12T11:08:27Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Pradhan, V., Evans, J. C., & Banerjee, T. (2013). Binomial confidence intervals for testing non-inferiority or superiority: a practitioner's dilemma. Statistical Methods In Medical Research | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11718/13527 | |
dc.description.abstract | In testing for non-inferiority or superiority in a single arm study, the confidence interval of a single binomial proportion is frequently used. A number of such intervals are proposed in the literature and implemented in standard software packages. Unfortunately, use of different intervals leads to conflicting conclusions. Practitioners thus face a serious dilemma in deciding which one to depend on. Is there a way to resolve this dilemma? We address this question by investigating the performances of ten commonly used intervals of a single binomial proportion, in the light of two criteria, viz., coverage and expected length of the interval. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Statistical Methods In Medical Research | en_US |
dc.subject | Binomial | en_US |
dc.title | Binomial confidence intervals for testing non-inferiority or superiority: a practitioner’s dilemma | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |