Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBhatnagar, Deepti
dc.date.accessioned2010-03-19T11:15:11Z
dc.date.available2010-03-19T11:15:11Z
dc.date.copyright1987-08
dc.date.issued2010-03-19T11:15:11Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/1360
dc.description.abstractPresent study was undertaken to find out whether different influence tactics are evaluated the same way, or differently, in downward and upward exercise of influence; whether appropriateness and effectiveness constitute two different dimensions of evaluation; and whether the sex of the influence agent and the influence target affects the evaluation of inlfuence tactics. Data were collected from 144 bank managers. Results shows that for influencing subordinates, manymore tactics are seen as being highly appropriate and effective, than for influencing superiors. Appropriateness and effectiveness emerged as two different dimensions of evaluation. The sex of the influence agent had no effect on the evaluation of influence tactics; however, the sex of the influence target affected the evaluation of the appropriateness of different influence tactics. Implications of these findings are presented.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWP;1987/695
dc.subjectmanagerial influenceen
dc.titleEvaluation of managerial influence tacticsen
dc.typeWorking Paperen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record