Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDalal, Ajit K.
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Ramadhar
dc.date.accessioned2010-03-20T09:37:54Z
dc.date.available2010-03-20T09:37:54Z
dc.date.copyright1979-12
dc.date.issued2010-03-20T09:37:54Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/1386
dc.description.abstractTwo experiments were performed to study job evaluation processes, using methods of information integration theory. Prospective job seekers rated hypothetical job descriptions according to (a) how much they would like to accept the job, and (b) how satisfied they would feel with the job of that kind. Job descriptions were constructed from a Context x Content factorial design, with 0.0, 0.5, and 1.0 proportion of good items as levels of the two stimulus factors. Graphic plots of the Context x Content effect on liking and expected satisfaction ratings showed a near-parallelism, though a small nonaddictive component was also present. Critical tests on both the group and individual subject data eliminated the adding rule and the multiplying rule, and supported the averaging rule.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWP;1979/304
dc.subjectJob satisfactionen
dc.titleIntegration theoretical analysis of expected job attractiveness and satisfactionen
dc.typeWorking Paperen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record