Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBalakrishnan, K.
dc.date.accessioned2010-03-22T05:05:25Z
dc.date.available2010-03-22T05:05:25Z
dc.date.copyright1979-11
dc.date.issued2010-03-22T05:05:25Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/1494
dc.description.abstractCorporate social responsibility is fast becoming a fashionable phrase among businessmen, managers, management academics, economists, politicians, and the public at large. Before these diverse groups plunge into serious debate on this crucial issue, one could perhaps leaner from the long experience of Western countries, especially the U.S., on this subject. A detailed scrutiny of a selected sample of Western thought showed that two different and distinct groups existed. One group looked at the problem as corporate power to be contained, curtailed, or countervailed - the negative view; the other as corporate responsibility to be mobilized, channeled, and sustained through appropriate supportive efforts - the positive view. What the two distinct groups saw depended on the locus of their observation.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWP;1979/302
dc.subjectCorporate social responsibilityen
dc.titleCorporate power and social responsibility: lessons from the westen
dc.typeWorking Paperen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record