• Login
    View Item 
    •   IIMA Institutional Repository Home
    • Faculty Publications (Bibliographic)
    • Journal Articles
    • View Item
    •   IIMA Institutional Repository Home
    • Faculty Publications (Bibliographic)
    • Journal Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    A multi-model analysis of post-2020 mitigation efforts of five major economies

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    A multi-model analysis of post_Limits special issue_paper.pdf (744.4Kb)
    Date
    2014
    Author
    Gernaat, David E. H. J.
    Ashina, Shuichi
    Calvin, Katherine V.
    Garg, Amit
    Isaac, Morna
    Lucas, Paul L.
    Mouratiadou, Ioanna
    Otto, Sander A. C.
    Rao, Shilpa
    Shukla, Priyadarshi R.
    Van Vliet, Jasper
    Van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This paper looks into the regional mitigation strategies of five major economies (China, EU, India, Japan, and USA) in the context of the 2°C target, using a multi-model comparison. In order to stay in line with the 2°C target, a tripling or quadrupling of mitigation ambitions is required in all regions by 2050, employing vigorous decarbonization of the energy supply system and achieving negative emissions during the second half of the century. In all regions looked at, decarbonization of energy supply (and in particular power generation) is more important than reducing energy demand. Some differences in abatement strategies across the regions are projected: In India and the USA the emphasis is on prolonging fossil fuel use by coupling conventional technologies with carbon storage, whereas the other main strategy depicts a shift to carbon-neutral technologies with mostly renewables (China, EU) or nuclear power (Japan). Regions with access to large amounts of biomass, such as the USA, China, and the EU, can make a trade-off between energy related emissions and land related emissions, as the use of bioenergy can lead to a net increase in land use emissions. After supply-side changes, the most important abatement strategy focuses on end-use efficiency improvements, leading to considerable emission reductions in both the industry and transport sectors across all regions. Abatement strategies for non-CO2 emissions and land use emissions are found to have a smaller potential. Inherent model, as well as collective, biases have been observed affecting the regional response strategy or the available reduction potential in specific (end-use) sectors.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11718/17345
    Collections
    • Journal Articles [3738]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of IIMA Institutional RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV