• Login
    View Item 
    •   IIMA Institutional Repository Home
    • Working Papers
    • Working Papers
    • View Item
    •   IIMA Institutional Repository Home
    • Working Papers
    • Working Papers
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Is India's federal debt sustainable? Revisiting an old debate

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    2004-11-02ttr.pdf (287.4Kb)
    Date
    2010-04-03
    Author
    Ram Mohan, T. T.
    Dholakia, Ravindra H.
    Karan, Navendu
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    That India faces a yfiscal crisisz has been a recurrent refrain of the literature on Indiazs economic reforms. Indeed a central objective of the reforms process, one that has proved elusive so far, is the reduction in the fiscal deficit of the central government. The supposed intractability of the fiscal problem has provided the motivation for the passage of the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act in 2003 that commits the government to targets for the fiscal and revenue deficits. We revisit the proposition that Indiazs debt problem is unsustainable in light of the recently changed outlook for growth and interest rates. Using a decomposition model, we separate out the effects on the fiscal deficit of growth and government behaviour in the past. We find that if recent government behaviour were to continue, the Indian economy would to achieve a growth rate of 6.5 per cent in the coming years, something that seems eminently achievable. Next, positing a nominal growth rate of 11 per cent (or a real growth rate of 6.1 per cent) in the coming years and making suitable assumptions about revenue buoyancy and other receipts, we empirically estimate the growth in primary expenditure that would be permissible. We find that no deceleration in primary expenditure is required if we assume a revenue buoyancy of 1 or above. We compare our optimistic projections with the sombre estimates of the Kelkar Task Force and find that our estimates differ from KTFzs because the KTF report postulates much higher levels of debt than we do. Clearly, we need a consensus on what Indiazs debt position today is. Nevertheless, our analysis does suggest that assessments of the sustainability of Indiazs debt have not adequately factored in the changed outlook for growth and interest rates.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11718/1903
    Collections
    • Working Papers [2627]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of IIMA Institutional RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV