Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTripathi, Sanjeev
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-07T05:39:24Z
dc.date.available2018-02-07T05:39:24Z
dc.date.issued2016-03-14
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/20271
dc.description.abstractWe examine the behavior of players when they play with their own vs. other people’s money; we investigate this for both dictator and ultimatum games. The results suggest that the behavior of the players differs when they play with their own money as compared to other people’s money. In a dictator game, the offer sizes are larger when playing for others, as people seem to offer more when they do not bear the cost. However, in ultimatum games, proposers tend to be more strategic, less risk averse and make lower offers, when they play with other people’s money than with their own money.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherIndian Institute of Management Ahmedabaden_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesW.P.;2016-03-16
dc.subjectDictator gameen_US
dc.subjectUltimatum gameen_US
dc.subjectOther people’s moneyen_US
dc.titleWhy should i care - Its others moneyen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record