Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGupta, Anil K.
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-21T11:06:10Z
dc.date.available2018-02-21T11:06:10Z
dc.date.issued1984-12-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/20368
dc.description.abstractRural development is essentially a process of widening decision making options of the majority of the poor. Creating choices without generating capacity to act might impair learning abilities of both, who create choices and also those who have to exercise these. Development agents, institutions and organizations often recognize after the fact that they failed to keep track of their learning vis-a-vis the learning is paid for by the poor who learn sometimes to be helpless. This paper lists certain aspects of mutual monitoring for appropriate learning at both the ends. Development experimentation involves costs which are often paid by those who benefit least from it. Policy planners seem to know all about why developmental programmes fail and yet we have not learnt to be impatient with failures? why don't we learn! How do we learn from those who have learned to live with our ignorance! The paper lists a few theorems on monitoring and learning besides identifying areas of future research.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherIndian Institute of Management Ahmedabaden_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesW. P.;No. 542
dc.subjectRural developmenten_US
dc.subjectPolicy plannersen_US
dc.subjectLogic of learningen_US
dc.titleWhy don't we learnen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record