Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJacob, Joshy
dc.contributor.authorDesai, Naman
dc.contributor.authorAgarwalla, Sobhesh Kumar
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-01T02:28:25Z
dc.date.available2019-01-01T02:28:25Z
dc.date.issued2018-10
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/21218
dc.description.abstractThis study examines fee premiums earned by Big 4 auditors in India and identifies the primary reason for such fee premiums. There are three primary drivers of Big 4 fee premiums. First, Big 4 auditors charge a fee premium for their reputation, which allows their clients to enjoy certain strategic benefits; second, they provide a superior quality of audit, which improves the quality of reported earnings; and third, they are considered to be potential indemnifiers of losses for a company's stakeholders. Since the legal regime in India is significantly less stringent and the risk of auditor litigation is relatively low, Big 4 premiums in India would not be driven by the need for auditors to indemnify losses. The results indicate that Big 4 auditors earn significantly higher fees in India and that clients of Big 4 auditors have significantly higher earnings response coefficients than clients of Non-Big 4 auditors. However, there is no difference in the quality of audit provided by Big 4 and Non-Big 4 auditors as measured by the quality of reported earnings. Our results also indicate that Big 4 auditors earn significantly higher abnormal fees but such fees do not lead to a reduction in earnings quality.en_US
dc.publisherAmerican Accounting Association (AAA)en_US
dc.subjectFee Premiumen_US
dc.subjectDiscretionary Accrualsen_US
dc.subjectAbnormal Audit Feesen_US
dc.titleAn examination of factors driving big 4 audit fee premiums: evidence from India's audit marketen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record