Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDholakia, Ravindra H.
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-13T22:52:53Z
dc.date.available2019-05-13T22:52:53Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationDholakia, R. H. (2018). Estimating labour quality index for India. Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 61(1), 67-85. doi: 10.1007/s41027-018-0120-9en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/21828
dc.description.abstractPresent paper provides a detailed critique of the traditional methodology of taking wage differential as equal to the differential of marginal productivity of labour and proposes to replace it by the differential of average productivity of labour types. The purpose in this paper is not to provide a concrete estimate of the labour quality index, but to discuss possibility of following an alternative method and expand the scope of measurement from the traditional age–sex–education classification to a wider range including some directly non-quantifiable labour qualities. The traditional method and the previous efforts made in India ignored classifications of workers based on the urban–rural residence, organized–unorganized sectors, public versus private sector employment, self-employed versus hired workers versus casual employees, and health and nutritional status. If all these qualitative aspects are properly considered, we can get a reasonably accurate marginal contribution of formal education, urbanization, privatization, self-employment and health and nutrition status of workers to the economic growth.en_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.subjectLabour qualityen_US
dc.subjectMarginal productivityen_US
dc.subjectWage differentialen_US
dc.subjectAverage productivity of labouren_US
dc.subjectUrban–rural differentialen_US
dc.subjectPublic–private employmenten_US
dc.titleEstimating labour quality index for Indiaen_US
dc.title.alternativeIndian Journal of Labour Economicsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record