Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLAHKAR, RATUL
dc.contributor.authorPingali, Viswanath
dc.contributor.authorSADHU, SANTADARSHAN
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-23T22:05:13Z
dc.date.available2019-05-23T22:05:13Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationLahkar, R., Pingali, V., & Sadhu, S. (2016). Does multiple borrowing necessarily mean overborrowing. Enterprise Development Microfinance: An International Journal Of Microfinance and Business Development, 27, (2), 132-141. DOI: 10.3362/l755- 1986.2016.009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/21913
dc.description.abstractUsing a survey dataset collected from Andhra Pradesh, India, we test if multiple borrowing is equivalent to over-borrowing. Results suggest that over-borrowing and multiple loans are not necessarily synonymous. As the number of credit agencies in a village increases, the average loan burden of villagers does not increase. We also find evidence of substitution of formal sources of credit for informal ones with increased presence of formal credit institutions. Such substitution is greater with addition of microcredit institutions than with other formal lending agencies. Our results indicate that joint liability setup seems to ensure that individuals at a greater risk of non-repayment are discouraged from obtaining microcredit.en_US
dc.publisherPractical Action Publishingen_US
dc.subjectmicrofinanceen_US
dc.subjectover-indebtednessen_US
dc.subjectmultiple borrowingen_US
dc.subjectjoint liabilityen_US
dc.titleDoes multiple borrowing necessarily mean over-borrowing?en_US
dc.title.alternativeEnterprise Development and Microfinanceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record