Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRavichandran, N.
dc.contributor.authorRadha, R.
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-01T01:25:57Z
dc.date.available2019-06-01T01:25:57Z
dc.date.issued2018-10-24
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/22002
dc.description.abstractA middle aged woman was advised hysterectomy based on the clinical symptoms presented by her. Hysterectomy was advised by an Oncology Gynecology surgeon. An experienced Urological Consultant advised against hysterectomy. Ms. Tara was confused and hence through a common friend reached out to a Gynecologist for a second opinion. The experience turned out to be not so pleasant and inconclusive in terms of opinion. Upset and disappointed with the experience, the patient and her husband were contemplating possible legal action against the Consultant. The central issue in the case is to decide the worthwhile nature of such an initiative.en_US
dc.publisherIndian Institute of Management Ahmedabaden_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesQM0283;
dc.subjectHysterectomyen_US
dc.subjectMedical Adviseen_US
dc.titleA Patient's Dilemma : To Litigate or Otherwiseen_US
dc.typeCases and Notesen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record