Oral Agreements, Implied Terms and the Context: Wells v Devani

dc.contributor.author	Pathak, Akhileshwar
dc.date.accessioned	2019-06-03T20:32:36Z
dc.date.available	2019-06-03T20:32:36Z
dc.date.issued	2019-03-29
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11718/22065
dc.description.abstract	Most business contracts are meant to be in writing, on standard terms. However, with the facilities of communications, businesspersons will talk business on the phone. With this, contentions will arise, whether they were only negotiating or had gone the distance and made a contract. If they have contracted, what are the terms of the contract? The case explores the judgement of the United Kingdom Supreme Court judgement, Wells v Devani, which is on the theme of oral contracts.	en_US
dc.publisher	Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad	en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries	BP0435;
dc.subject	Formation of Contracts	en_US
dc.subject	Consideration	en_US
dc.subject	Implied Terms	en_US
dc.title	Oral Agreements, Implied Terms and the Context: Wells v Devani	en_US
dc.type	Cases and Notes	en_US

Files in this item

Files	Size	Format	View
There are no files associated with this item.