Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPathak, Akhileshwar
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-04T22:21:44Z
dc.date.available2019-06-04T22:21:44Z
dc.date.issued2017-09-26
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/22164
dc.description.abstractA person can approach the High Court directly under Article 226 for a violation of a Fundamental Right. The Fundamental Rights, however, are available only against the bodies which are ‘state’ within Article 12 of the Constitution. The judgement of the Supreme Court in Dr. Janet Jeyapaul v. SRM University extends the ambit of Article 226 to all bodies, whether governmental or private, which are performing ‘public function’ or ‘public duty’. Imparting education is taken to be a public function. The judgement opens new dimensions of constitutional law.en_US
dc.publisherIndian Institute of Management Ahmedabaden_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBP0413;
dc.subjectFundamental Rightsen_US
dc.subjectArticle 226en_US
dc.subjectPublic Functionen_US
dc.titleDr. Janel Jeyapaul v. SRM University: Private Organisations and Public Rightsen_US
dc.typeCases and Notesen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record