Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSinha, Anamika
dc.contributor.authorVarkkey, Biju
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-06T22:57:18Z
dc.date.available2019-06-06T22:57:18Z
dc.date.issued2017-09-26
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/22233
dc.description.abstractThe case discusses issues in the process of professionalising a family-owned manufacturing firm in the steel tubes and pipes industry. Set during 2008-2012, the case highlights the increased competition and the consequent growth in the sector that drives the need for professionalisation. In order to remain competitively relevant, the owners, who were followers of Jainism, had realised that in their business, all other things being equal, a company with trained and engaged manpower had an advantage in the market and over competition. With this thought, the firm initiated a blended training program. While mapping the activities related to employee training with outcomes at different levels, it found that though the reported Return on Training Investment (ROTI) was good, the company was losing out on intangible factors such as employee engagement and the belief system that had traditionally held employees together. Current practices had to change, thereby leading existing members to lose the belief they held in the company. The turn of events put both the owners and the HR department in a dilemma over the entire transformation initiative.en_US
dc.publisherIndian Institute of Management Ahmedabaden_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesHRM0236;
dc.subjectCultural Changeen_US
dc.subjectTraining Metricsen_US
dc.subjectTraining Evaluationen_US
dc.titleThe Paradox of Training Metricsen_US
dc.typeCases and Notesen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record