Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorNoronha, Ernesto
dc.contributor.authorDewan, Apoorva
dc.contributor.authorBalu, Patil Ashish
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-19T22:40:14Z
dc.date.available2019-08-19T22:40:14Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/22340
dc.description.abstractEmployee engagement was first referred and defined in Kahn’s literature (Kahn, A professor of Organisational Behaviour in Boston University’s Questrom School of Business) in 1990. Kahn’s research paper entitled, Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement’, demonstrated for the first time that the fundamental problem is ‘how employees felt’ and is not ‘are they right fit’ or ‘are financial rewards lacking’. According to Kahn, the concept of engagement was based on the premise that,” individuals can make real choices about how much of their real, personal selves they would reveal and express in their work.” This premise was in complete contradiction with the operating premises in 1990. After Kahn, the extent of research effort directed on employee engagement was minimal. However, only until last ten years, employee engagement became so popular in management science. There are two major reasons for this exponential popularity of the subject. First, claims are made by researchers about positive correlation of employee engagement with employee outcomes, financial performance and organisational success (Bates, 2004; Baumruk, 2004; Harter et al., 2002; Richman, 2006). And second, reports have stated that the ‘engagement gap’ i.e. workforce which is either disengaged or not fully engaged has increased, and this engagement gap is costing businesses in the form of lost productivity. (Bates, 2004; Johnson, 2004; Kowalski, 2003) Research literature on engagement can be categorised into five major areas. First, the exploration of meaning of employee engagement. Second, understanding business-unit level relationship of employee satisfaction with employee engagement, and business outcomes, also referred to as meta-analysis. Third, antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Fourth, engaging an employee for success i.e. enhancing performance of an employee through employee engagement. And last, the challenge of regaining employee engagement and reducing cynicism.en_US
dc.publisherIndian Institute of Management Ahmedabaden_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSP_2498en_US
dc.subjectEmployee Engagementen_US
dc.subjectOrganizational commitmenten_US
dc.subjectPharmaceutical Industryen_US
dc.titleStudy of engagement and related aspects among sales forces in Pharmaceutical Industryen_US
dc.typeStudent Projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record