Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJacob, Joshy
dc.contributor.authorDesai, Naman
dc.contributor.authorAgarwalla, Sobhesh Kumar
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-04T03:50:14Z
dc.date.available2020-06-04T03:50:14Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationJacob, J., Desai, N. K., & Agarwalla, S. K. (2019). An examination of factors driving big 4 audit fee premiums: Evidence from India’s audit market. Accounting Horizons, 33(2), 43-58. doi:https://doi.org/10.2308/acch- 52347en_US
dc.identifier.issn1558-7975
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/23059
dc.description.abstractThis study examines fee premiums earned by Big 4 auditors in India and identifies the primary reason for such fee premiums. There are three primary drivers of Big 4 fee premiums. Big 4 auditors charge a fee premium for their reputation, for providing a superior quality of audit, and for indemnifying losses for a company’s stakeholders. Since the risk of auditor litigation in India is relatively low, Big 4 premiums in India would not be driven by the need for auditors to indemnify losses. The results indicate that Big 4 auditors earn significantly higher fees in India and also that their clients enjoy significantly higher earnings response coefficients compared to non-Big 4 clients. However, there is no difference in the quality of audit provided by Big 4 and non-Big 4 auditors as measured by the magnitude of reported discretionary accruals.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Accounting Associationen_US
dc.subjectFee premiumen_US
dc.subjectERCen_US
dc.subjectDiscretionary accrualsen_US
dc.subjectAbnormal audit feesen_US
dc.titleAn examination of factors driving big 4 audit fee premiums: Evidence from India’s audit marketen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record