Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Sarah Lindstrom
dc.contributor.authorReichenberg, Ray E.
dc.contributor.authorShukla, Kathan
dc.contributor.authorWaasdorp, Tracy E.
dc.contributor.authorBradshaw, Catherine P.
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-28T11:13:20Z
dc.date.available2021-05-28T11:13:20Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationJohnson, S. L., Reichenberg, R. E., Shukla, K., Waasdorp, T. E., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2019). Improving the measurement of school climate using item response theory. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 38(4), 99-107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12296en_US
dc.identifier.issn17453992 (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/23934
dc.description.abstractThe U.S. government has become increasingly focused on school climate, as recently evidenced by its inclusion as an accountability indicator in the Every Student Succeeds Act. Yet, there remains considerable variability in both conceptualizing and measuring school climate. To better inform the research and practice related to school climate and its measurement, we leveraged item response theory (IRT), a commonly used psychometric approach for the design of achievement assessments, to create a parsimonious measure of school climate that operates across varying individual characteristics. Students (n = 69,513) in 111 secondary schools completed a school climate assessment focused on three domains of climate (i.e., safety, engagement, and environment), as defined by the U.S. Department of Education. Item and test characteristics were estimated using the mirt package in R using unidimensional IRT. Analyses revealed measurement difficulties that resulted in a greater ability to assess less favorable perspectives on school climate. Differential item functioning analyses indicated measurement differences based on student academic success. These findings support the development of a broad measure of school climate but also highlight the importance of work to ensure precision in measuring school climate, particularly when considering use as an accountability measure.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEducational Measurement: Issues and Practiceen_US
dc.subjectItem response theoryen_US
dc.subjectMeasurement invarianceen_US
dc.subjectSchool accountabilityen_US
dc.subjectSchool climateen_US
dc.titleImproving the measurement of school climate using item response theoryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record