Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAgarwalla, Sobhesh Kumar
dc.contributor.authorGupta, Gunjan
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Sonal
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-11T06:20:19Z
dc.date.available2021-10-11T06:20:19Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/24325
dc.description.abstractComing on the heels of Uber’s IPO in May 2019, the initial public offering of the new age office space provider WeWork was highly anticipated on Wall Street- with a valuation of $ 47 Billion and explosive membership growth from 450 in 2010 to 527,000 in 20191, WeWork seemed poised to take over the office-rental space in an unprecedented manner. WeWork was slated to trade under the ticker WE with J.P. Morgan Chase and Goldman Sachs acting as the main underwriters for the IPO2. However, the release of the company’s S-1 filing which contained some unusual items rang an alarm bell amongst investors leading to a stark plunge in the valuation of the company. WeWork, backed by famed investor SoftBank, has lost more than $ 35 Billion in valuation in the year since then- from $47 Billion in 2019 to $ 8 Billion in 20203; this drop was precipitated by investors’ concerns over WeWork’s risky business model and negative cash flows, dubious corporate governance standards, and the erratic behaviour of its Founder-CEO Adam Neumann.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIndian Institute pf Management Ahmedabaden_US
dc.subjectWeWork's IPO implosionen_US
dc.subjectTech-companyen_US
dc.subjectCorporate structureen_US
dc.subjectVenture capitalen_US
dc.titleCase study on factors behind WeWork’s IPO implosionen_US
dc.typeStudent Projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record