Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDesai, Naman
dc.contributor.authorMenon, Amritha
dc.contributor.authorSharma, Shubhankar
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-24T11:16:11Z
dc.date.available2021-11-24T11:16:11Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/24613
dc.description.abstractThe Fama-French 3-factor model started by observing that two types of stocks tend to do better than the market (Small-cap stocks and stocks with high book-to-market ratio). However, we observe that the value stocks have underperformed compared to growth stocks in the last decade. This trend can be cyclical (where value stocks will eventually outperform growth stocks) or a sign of things to come (growth stocks have become intrinsically better due to changes in conducting business in the 21st century). However, we believe that there is a third possible reason- the metrics used to define growth and value stocks under the Fama-French model may no longer be as relevant as they were in the 1990s).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIndian Institute of Management Ahmedabaden_US
dc.subjectMulti-factor modelsen_US
dc.subjectAcademiaen_US
dc.subjectValue versus growth investingen_US
dc.subjectRegressionen_US
dc.titleRedefining multi-factor models for the 21st centuryen_US
dc.typeStudent Projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record