Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSingh, Pranav Pratap
dc.contributor.authorParasrampuria, Ishita
dc.contributor.authorPatodia, Sumedh
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-02T09:10:34Z
dc.date.available2023-04-02T09:10:34Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-07
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/26253
dc.description.abstractCredit Rating Agencies are tasked with evaluating the credit quality of all fixed income instruments being offered in the market, short-term as well as long-term. They serve as the guiding force for investors in the fixed income securities market, the buyers of bonds and other instruments, by presenting their opinion on the credit risk associated with a certain company, as well as that on comparable companies. Credit ratings also serves as a cost and time effective tool for investors to analyse superior information and identify profit opportunities keeping in mind the associated risk, which would be difficult for them to get access to otherwise. The major credit rating agencies in India are CRISIL, ICRA and CARE, while others are Fitch and BWR to be recognized by SEBI. Studies have shown more lenient standards of rating in India as compared to other emerging and developed markets, as well as a significant time lag in the impact of financial information on the credit ratings of instruments issued by a company (NISM, 2009). The strongest growing class of investments in the Indian economy, the mutual fund industry comprises 52.4% of Debt-fund schemes with an average AUM of Rs.12.9 lakh crores, out of which ~36% is attributed to Liquid (Overnight) fund schemes. 19 Mutual Fund Liquid Schemes exist in the market with an average AUM of above Rs. 1,000 crores, operating under strong guidelines from SEBI with regards to their investment strategies and risk exposure. However, we observe that there is a recurrent alpha, in the range of ~18 basis points to ~67 basis points, being generated as the spread between the highest and lowest returns amongst the top 12 (by AUM size) Liquid Fund Schemes in each quarter over the past 5 years. Theory suggests that higher returns are a reward of accepting higher risks in your investment, however with the entire quantum of these Liquid fund schemes being invested only in the highest rated short-term debt instruments, the variation of ~11% (calculated as a percentage on the average highest Liquid return) between the returns of different schemes poses an anomaly in the market.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIndian Institute of Management Ahmedabaden_US
dc.subjectCorporate debt instrumentsen_US
dc.subjectCredit rating agenciesen_US
dc.subjectCredit rating glossaryen_US
dc.subjectCredit qualityen_US
dc.titleAnalysis of the long-term and short-term rating of corporate debt Instruments by credit rating agenciesen_US
dc.typeStudent Projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record