| dc.contributor.author | Rangarajan, C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mampilly, Paul | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2010-06-01T04:20:41Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2010-06-01T04:20:41Z | |
| dc.date.copyright | 1971-11-27 | |
| dc.date.issued | 1971-11-27T04:20:41Z | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.7(9), 26 Feb,1972 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11718/3552 | |
| dc.description.abstract | IN 'Net Present Value versus Internal
Rate of Return' (November 27, 1971,
pp M-153-6), Rangarajan and Mampilly
express the view that while both the
Net Present Value (NPV) and the Internal
Rate of Return techniques have an
underlying implicit assumption about
re-investment of the cash flows
generated during the life-time of a project,
the main difference between them
lies in assuming different re-investment
rates. | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.title | Net present value Vs internal rate of returns | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |
