Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPatibandla, Murali
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-14T09:21:16Z
dc.date.available2010-07-14T09:21:16Z
dc.date.copyright1995
dc.date.issued1995-07-14T09:21:16Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/5222
dc.descriptionEconomic and Political Weekly, (November 4, 1995)en
dc.description.abstractDURING the last few years we have heard and read quite a bit about how the past industrial and trade policies stifled Indian industry and the recent policy reforms would release the caged tiger. Sometimes the excess obsession with the restrictive nature of the previous policies appears to make many researchers blind to several other important aspects of the industrial structure and its evolution; in the process, they fail to identify the important gaps and shortcomings of the present policy reforms. One simple example is that one has heard several times how the industrial licensing had been a major source of entry barrier and long run market power which, in turn, made Indian oligopoly firms highly X-inefficient. But one rarely comes across a serious analysis of othfer important sources of entry barriers like capital market imperfections and high domestic market transaction costs, which persist even in the post-liberalisation period
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectIndian Industryen
dc.titleIndian Industry and Industrial policy at the crossroadsen
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record