dc.contributor.author | Gupta, Anil K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Chandak, Vikas | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-07-22T04:33:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-07-22T04:33:34Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 2004-07-01 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-07-22T04:33:34Z | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11718/5950 | |
dc.description.abstract | Development of sustainable pest management strategies in agriculture has become
necessary in view of increasing non-viability of chemical based approach. Among
various approaches for the purpose, policy makers have paid far more attention to
biotechnological alternatives. The first transgenic variety was approved for commercial
trials in cotton. However, some companies incorporate the Bt gene from the approved
varieties in other varieties and released such hybrids to the farmers. It so happened that
these hybrids though illegal and released unethically proved more remunerative to the
farmers. As if this was not enough, farmers made crosses of this hybrid developed by
NABARD seed company and developed their own locally suited varieties.
The paper describes the ethical, business and political dimensions of agriculture
biotechnology in India with specific reference to the experience of Bt cotton in Gujarat.
The neglect of IPM, herbal pesticides and bio control methods becomes even less
justified when state not only tolerates but also encourages widespread experimentation of
Bt cotton without any regulation or monitoring. Implications for future policy for
technological change have been outlined in the paper. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | WP;2004/1829 | |
dc.subject | Agricultural biotechnology - India | en |
dc.title | Agricultural biotechnology in India: ethics, business and politics | en |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |