| dc.contributor.author | Barua, Samir K. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Srinivasan, G. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-22T04:27:08Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2010-09-22T04:27:08Z | |
| dc.date.copyright | 1986 | |
| dc.date.issued | 1986-09-22T04:27:08Z | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11718/8899 | |
| dc.description | Vikalpa, Vol. 12, No. 1, (January-March 1987), pp. 57-61 | en |
| dc.description.abstract | Although government has set up various
regulatory agencies to safeguard
interests of various constituents of the
capital market, they do not seem to be
working in coordination. In fact, they
appear to be pulling in different directions.
S K Barua and G Srinivasan comment
on this feature, illustrating their
case with an example from Reliance
Industries where setting the terms for
convertible debenture issues is seen as
an encroachment on the rights of
shareholders | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.subject | Capital Market | en |
| dc.subject | Company Law | en |
| dc.title | Setting the terms for convertible debenture issues: should the spirit of company law be violated | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |
