| dc.contributor.author | Singh, Gurdev | |
| dc.contributor.author | Asokan, S. R. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-27T06:34:26Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2010-09-27T06:34:26Z | |
| dc.date.copyright | 1988 | |
| dc.date.issued | 1988-09-27T06:34:26Z | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11718/9052 | |
| dc.description | Vikalpa, Vol. 13, No. 3, (July - September 1988), pp. 61- 83 | en |
| dc.description.abstract | BTR, a manufacturer of turpentine oil and
rosin, is a member of a consortium of eight
state-level public sector units in Uttar
Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh and Jammu &
Kashmir.
The Consortium fixes uniform selling
prices for the members' output —rosin
and turpentine oil. BTR's competitors are
public and private sector units and
importers of rosin.
Supply and prices of resin, the main
raw material, are regulated by each state
government based on availability and cost
of collection, which vary considerably.
The managing director of BTR
wonders whether BTR should continue its
membership of the Consortium. The case
raises many other issues: what objectives
can and should the Consortium serve?
what are the objectives served by the
regulatory policies of the state governments?
Will getting out of the Consortium
help achieve BTR or state government
objectives? | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.subject | Manufacturing Unit | en |
| dc.subject | Turpentine | en |
| dc.subject | Oil | en |
| dc.subject | Rosin | en |
| dc.title | BTR Ltd. Rampur, UP (Diagnostic Case) | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |
