| dc.contributor.author | Desai, Bhupat M. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2010-10-07T10:11:10Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2010-10-07T10:11:10Z | |
| dc.date.copyright | 1997 | |
| dc.date.issued | 1997-10-07T10:11:10Z | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11718/9421 | |
| dc.description | Vikalpa, Vol. 22, No. 2, (April-June, 1997) | en |
| dc.description.abstract | According to the author, though the
budget has some positive initiatives for
agriculture, they are unlikely to pull the
sector out of its poor growth in postreform
period. Moreover, the budget
shows that the govern~ent expenditure
for agriculture leaves much to be desired.
Therefore, the author suggests that the
budget could have had better inter-sectoral
perspective for generation and allocation
of resources to employment-led economic
growth and alleviation of absolute poverty
with which agricultural growth is
complementary. | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.subject | Agriculture | en |
| dc.title | Budget: a retrograde for agriculture | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |
