dc.contributor.author | Gupta, Anil K. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-10-15T06:56:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-10-15T06:56:03Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 2000 | |
dc.date.issued | 2000-10-15T06:56:03Z | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11718/9677 | |
dc.description | LEISA India, Vol. 2, No. 2, (July 2000), pp. 20-21 | en |
dc.description.abstract | Although participation is much discussed, poor people rarely get the opportunity to develop their
own agenda and vision or set terms for the involvement of outsiders. The entire participatory
paradigm illustrates that people are participating in plans and programmes that we – outsiders –
have designed. Not only is little opportunity for them to articulate their ideas, there is seldom an
institutional space where their ingenuity and creativity in solving their problems can be
recognised, respected and rewarded.
Poor people must be inventive to survive. However, sometimes their coping strategies are
inadequate and then they have serious difficulties in meeting their basic needs, educating their
children and generating sustainable employment opportunities. Nevertheless, there are clear signs
that within their local knowledge they have a tremendous potential for restoring the economic and
ecological balance. | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.subject | Agriculture | en |
dc.subject | Farming | en |
dc.subject | Knowledge | en |
dc.subject | Networking | en |
dc.subject | Research | en |
dc.title | Grassroots innovations for survival | en |
dc.type | Article | en |